[Update 3] GameSpot reviewer fired over bad review |
|
| BY Rain Anderson Nov. 30th, 2007 | |

Kotaku received an anonymous tip yesterday about long time GameSpot reviewer Jeff Gerstmann being fired because of a low score he gave to Kane & Lynch: Dead Men. The more interesting and disturbing part is that GameSpot was apparently under pressure from Eidos Interactive, the publisher of the game.
GameSpot has been littered with Kane & Lynch ads recently and Eidos threatened to pull the plug, meaning a loss of revenue for CNET-owned GameSpot. Despite the Kotaku tipster specifying that it wasn’t necessarily the low score of 6 out of 10 but the ‘tone’ of the review that got the man fired, the day when advertisers will be able to get reviewers fired and set the tone of reviews by waving a stack of cash at your face is a sad day indeed.
Surprisingly, there are no Kane & Lynch ads on GameSpot at the time of writing, instead the site is displaying ads for Ubisoft’s Assassin’s Creed. Did Eidos pull the advertising anyway or is GameSpot trying to save face ? (Update below)
Shacknews has also confidently confirmed from their end that Gerstmann has indeed been fired from his position (update below). And former GameSpot editor and current MP3.com - also CNET-owned - employee Tim Tracy has posted what seems to be a farewell notice on his GameSpot blog. It’s unknown if it’s related to the Gerstmann axing.
My gut tells me this isn’t the last we’ve heard of this, so we’ll keep you updated when new information surfaces. But with this fiasco going on, makes you wonder how the industry will receive Kane & Lynch 2, which is already in production. Because when (and if) it releases, references to this incident will no doubt be made.
Update: Jeff Gerstmann has since confirmed himself that he has indeed been let go. He’s “not really able to comment on the specifics” but is “looking forward to getting back out there and figuring out what’s next.” In the meanwhile huge forum topics have grown in the GameSpot forums, especially this one with over 4800 posts. The official Eidos forums got a similar treatment but after shutting it down for a while, the admins are now locking any thread discussing this topic at first sight, calling it a rumor and saying “there will be no further discussion.”
Penny Arcade writes that they’re being told the advertisements that Eidos was displaying on GameSpot were worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and that they’ve now pulled hundreds of thousands worth of future advertising from the site.
Update 2: CNET issues official comment on Gerstmann axing
Update 3: Updates regarding Jeff Gerstmann firing
Below is Jeff Gerstmann’s video review of Kane & Lynch: Dead Men, now removed from GameSpot by the way.













December 1st, 2007
at 10:35 pm
am glad this guy got fired kane and lynch was the only game i actully enjowed playing in months
December 2nd, 2007
at 3:59 am
Yeah, but you’re an idiot with no taste, someone should fire you from life :P
December 2nd, 2007
at 4:54 pm
Yeah the game did not deserve anything other then a 6…
If you want a 10 scoring game…instead of paying websites to lie to us fans, how about devs actually just get there heads out of there asses and make a game worth getting a 10. Instead of throwing money around to get what they want.
December 4th, 2007
at 12:11 am
The integrity of gamespot is lost. Their censorship is completely fraudulent and this ruins my perception on all their reviews.
December 4th, 2007
at 1:19 pm
Agreed. How can GS expect anyone to take them seriously now. Their new ad formats are absolutely disgusting as well. Having the full background is one thing but the flash ad sliding in front of the screenshots from both sides is sickening.
December 5th, 2007
at 12:36 pm
Gamespot is going to loose a lot of members this way, thats for sure!
December 8th, 2007
at 2:59 am
Yeah, why don’t the game review companies just give scores based on how much the game companies pay them? Make it in increments of $10,000.
$10,000 = 1/10
$100,000 = 10/10
Of course, inflation will kick in, and perhaps the game companies will want to make sure only their games get the best reviews, so eventually that 10/10 will cost $200,000 or more and smaller companies will have to settle for maybe 7/10s or so. Yeah, that sounds about right. Perhaps the game companies can be encouraged to fork overeven more money for positive descriptions like “mind-blowing,” “stunning graphics,” and “engaging storyline?” $1,000 per adjective!