Home
Become an editor or a contributor! Here’s how..
GTA IV stirs up new controversy, this time involving ethics in videogame journalism
BY Dan Haspert Apr. 28th, 2008 More on:

Ethics in videogame journalism is unfortunately not a new topic, many of us will of course remember “Gerstmann-Gate” where GameSpot’s senior editor Jeff Gerstmann was fired for presumably having a wrong tone when reviewing Kane & Lynch: Dead Men late last year. It was later revealed by GameSpot that they did not fire Gerstmann because of the review but rather because they were growing increasingly unhappy with his performance and this was apparently a long time coming. Whether or not the man was fired because of the review or because he was indeed a bad employee, the horrible timing of the whole situation has sullied the good name of videogame journalism.

Ben Fritz, a videogame correspondent for Variety, has written an article claiming further possible unethical behavior, this time focusing on IGN’s exclusive first review of Grand Theft Auto IV, and the perfect 10 it received. Fritz prefaces his article by saying that because he has not played GTA IV, he doesn’t know if the game was in fact deserving of a 10 and doesn’t believe that IGN is being dishonest in this case. What he does believe is that the whole concept of exclusive reviews is ethically questionable.

As evidence, he cites the exclusive review of Mass Effect that GameInformer ran several weeks prior to the games release and the near perfect score of 9.75 it received. In the review, several significant flaws were noted but the game received a lofty score regardless. Was it because they felt pressured by Microsoft who gave them their exclusive first crack at a review, or was it simply that, in spite of its flaws, Mass Effect deserved the score; Fritz believes it may have been the former rather than the latter.

Fritz feels that exclusive reviews have the ability to sell magazines, and increase web traffic, thus increasing revenue from advertisements, thus journalists may feel beholden to the publisher for granting them this most holy of privileges, thus leading journalists to look past flaws in gameplay, frame rate, and story, instead focusing on the games positives, to stay in favor with the publisher.

Personally, I trust Hilary Goldstein, who reviewed GTA IV for IGN, I read a lot of reviews from a lot of sites and he’s not one to hold punches. At times he’s too hard on genres that he does not particularly like, but he doesn’t seem like the dollar is his bottom line. But either way, consumers should never base their decision to buy a game off just one review. It’s very subjective and what one person loves, another will hate. So it’s always smart to check out several reviews before spending your hard earned money on something you may not end up liking.

[See also: Grand Theft Auto IV gallery]

Sign up for our daily updates! Enter your e-mail and get fresh gaming news delivered straight to your mailbox once a day.
RELATED STORIES
 
POST AUTHOR
Dan Haspert
More from this author
Dan Haspert.

    1. Nico
      April 28th, 2008
      at 7:02 pm

      Exclusive review suck and are in-interesting (who read a review anyway ?).
      it’s like a 10 or a 2 will make a difference in how many people will buy GTA 4 the first week…?

      If a review was important, Okami would have sell more than Madden after all.

        Reply
      Phil
      April 28th, 2008
      at 8:51 pm

      Well, the reason they call it exclusive is for the fact that THEY GET TO RELEASE FIRST! Now I’m not defending IGN. Hell who would? But your paranoia is leading you astray. So yeah, keep your opinions on this particular subject to yourself. PLEASE!

        Reply
      Jason Cook
      April 28th, 2008
      at 9:26 pm

      Yeah I am pretty sure GTA IV is getting a lot of 10/10 scores, not just because of publisher pressure.

      As far as Mass Effect goes, I just read it and I don’t think minor issues with the combat constitutes “significant flaws.”

        Reply
      March
      April 29th, 2008
      at 6:05 am

      Good call, Variety. I would never trust a web site that makes a big deal of having the first reveiw up, especially since that’s never done in movie reporting. That just stinks of loss of credibility, and puts your ethics into question.

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=TB4loah_sXw

      Whoops.

        Reply
      Dan Haspert
      April 29th, 2008
      at 6:43 am

      Good find March.

        Reply
      Nico
      April 29th, 2008
      at 7:43 am

      Hey Phil :).
      if your answer was for me, I must say I forgot to put some “smileys” in my message, or at least, making my sentence more clear so people would understand that it was more cynic and humor than something that really bother me or I really think :)… my bad!

        Reply
      Danny Morgan
      April 29th, 2008
      at 12:35 pm

      I personally like IGN - but then again I only use the Wii section. You kinda ‘get to know’ the editors and writers. I read that IGN review. The write-up was good but the video review was awfully short. In any case I always check out more than one review…surely most people do?! I think reviews are better for a general idea. i.e. a game that you’re really anticipating but then all the reviews are pretty bad. It might make you think twice.

      But I do think exclusive reviews are a bit iffy. There’s gonna be some bias there. Besides what’s the point in reading an exclusive review before you can buy the game anyway? May as well wait and check them all.

        Reply

    While we hate limiting conversations in any way, please note that insulting/abusive comments will be removed without hesitation.

    What shall we call you around these parts?

    Remains hidden from others at all times.