Home We’re looking for writers!
Join our writing team, here’s how >
Home / Best days of PC gaming coming soon
RSS feed Send news tip | Contact
Chris King. BY Chris KingMay 4th, 2008
Best days of PC gaming coming soon
Editorial Industry PC Rumor
Add to gametaggrAdd to diggAdd to reddit

Mark these words, computer graphics processors in the not too distant horizon are poised to make a big leap in technology, much more than we’ve grown used to seeing over the last several years. Oh yes, good days are ahead for PC gamers. Perhaps the leap will be enough to put some distance between PC and console games so that it’ll actually worthwhile again to purchase the PC version instead for those who own both.

Over the last month, tensions between NVIDIA and Intel have been steadily escalating as verbal mortal shells have been lobbed back and forth between the two camps. Judging by some of the press statements being made, the two sides have all but unofficially declared war upon one another in the graphics processing arena.

In the process of Intel’s hype machine going into overdrive in an attempt to promote their upcoming integrated processor-graphics chip, Larrabee, the company seemingly opened Pandora’s Box with some statements regarding the demise of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) during the Intel Developer Forum in Shanghai. The most interesting statement came from Intel senior vice president Pat Gelsinger that read, in part, “graphics that we have all come to know and love today, I have news for you. It’s coming to an end.”

While these threats have apparently been scaring off some of GPU market leader NVIDIA’s shareholders, they have only emboldened its fiery CEO, Jen-Hsun Huang, who went off on a well-publicized rant in response at a recent NVIDIA financial analyst day event.

If you haven’t been keeping up with this news, this is your cue to start paying attention because this is the beginning and things are only going to get a lot more heated. Regardless of who will “win” this tech war, one thing is for sure — we the consumers are going to reap the benefits as the two struggle to outdo one another.

Perhaps Intel has decided to pursue this “sideways” approach to further developing their processor technology because they feel there’s not much more room to go “up” for now. This is if one considers that their quad core chips are still impractical (offering little benefit over dual core) for most users and practical cooling remains a barrier to breaking 4.0 GHz OEM processor speeds. On the other side of the coin, NVIDIA’s recent unveiling of their generation 9 GPUs left some enthusiasts feeling a bit under whelmed; perhaps NVIDIA has been purposely holding off for something big.

Intel’s Larrabee is a wildcard at this point, but it has a big gap to fill given a comparison of both Intel and NVIDIA’s discreet graphics offerings over the last ten plus years until now. What is almost entirely certain is to expect NVIDIA to pull off the gloves and unveil a monster the likes of which we have never seen with either their generation 10 or 11 cards. Also of interesting note is that both companies seem to be ignoring little AMD, which is developing its own processor with integrated graphics named Fusion, no doubt making use of its acquisition of ATI. Maybe AMD will come out of nowhere with a sucker punch?

Yes, fellow PC gamers, things are about to get real interesting. Start saving your money and pull up a chair.

    1. Kakkoii says:

    Nice blog post. But you should have researched some more so you could go into more detail.

    Because Nvidia is actually bringing out something pretty big…

    In July Nvidia will be releasing a Graphics chip that will have over 1 BILLION transistors…

    The highest transistors on a GPU right now is 754 Million.

    This is sure to bring quite a substantial performance gain. And there is most likely more powerful products Nvidia is still keeping secret that will be coming after.

    May 4th, 2008 at 11:30 am Reply
    2. Rapture333 says:

    Hmm, Sounds very interesting. I want to save up for a GPU + CPU. But seeing as how fist things are moving (In all different directions might I add) we’ll just have to wait and watch what theese giants can come up with.

    May 4th, 2008 at 11:53 pm Reply
    3. zues says:

    Sorry, but it wont be in 08, more like late 09. Intel is already showing off their “6 core” processors and thats all they want to be pushing out the door right now. They will toss words with who ever but graphic wise intel has that on the back burner.

    May 4th, 2008 at 11:57 pm Reply
    4. Yuan says:

    Great, I have been a PC gamer for a long time while i do greatly love strategy and 1st person shooters this new age for the PC may just give me more variety, plus better games in the same fields i mentioned are sure to come up. (I still can’t wait for “Spore” to come out…)

    May 5th, 2008 at 3:50 am Reply
    5. zagibu says:

    I don’t think better graphics will give us better games, sorry. Also, PC-exclusive developers are dwindling, and cheap console-ports are growing.

    May 5th, 2008 at 5:47 am Reply
    6. Noky says:

    zagibu struck the same chord I wanted to hit.

    Your logic is flawed. We’re in line to get some breath-taking graphics but that doesn’t mean games are going to be making any big leaps and bounds. I don’t see the gaming industry getting better anytime soon.

    Publishers still aren’t throwing money at innovation. The PC has it extra tough because although you save money on SDK (because you don’t have to buy one), you run in to compatibility issues across differently hardware combinations. Furthermore, low sales and rampant piracy make it hard to justify publishers investing in PC development.

    At the end of the day, it’s not that developers don’t want to develop for the PC as much as they need to eat and therefore they develop for the consoles where the money is.

    Don’t take my words for fact, I often have no idea what I’m talking about…

    May 5th, 2008 at 7:22 am Reply
    7. Andysek77 says:

    Crytek: No other PC exclusive games! (piracy) …. WHO will develop these super games on super extra PC´s? Who will buy 7 and more milions copy´s of PC title? Blah… developers will make games for consoles, because they will this way get MOOOORE money… finish

    May 5th, 2008 at 9:32 am Reply
    8. Chris King says:

    While I agree that just because raw power of the PC will improve it doesn’t mean the games will get better, it will still be nice. There is no magic hardware that will make better games…lots of people were expecting groundbreaking gameplay with PS3 and Xbox 360 and realized it’s just more of the same. So while better graphics won’t make better games, it sure is nice. Would you really want to play the same games back on the PS2 or Xbox or on the newest generation systems? Most people would rather have it on the newest gen.

    Also, yes, piracy on the PC has always been a rampant problem. There were days before CD keys were commonplace for PC games, this is not a new problem, yet developers have continued to make great PC games and they still are.

    What I was really gettng at, is that it doesn’t even have to be a PC exclusive game. The simple fact is, for the priveleged gamers who can afford a really nice gaming PC, a big leap in technology will be very welcome. That means games can be enjoyed with much more beautiful rendering / higher framerate than those stuck playing the same title on console. Having PC exclusive games like Starcraft 2 is just icing on the cake. If this new technology entirely changes the way games will be rendered (i.e. scrapping DirectX altogether and starting over), one can be certain that there will be games developed for the new tech. At that time, console only gamers may be left out in the cold for quite a while.

    These are just my educated opinions though, make your own judgements. :)

    May 5th, 2008 at 8:32 pm Reply
    9. SmOkM says:

    Put it this way.

    Thers a market out there for top end GPU’s

    if theres a market out there for top end hardware , then the same market applies to new top end games pc based.

    piracy is larger now yes, but most new games have a substantial multi player , which isnt a feature a pirated copy/download can include without a valid CDkey.

    and to be honest if people pay a bucket load for this hardware, the cost of the pc game to include your multi player. isnt going to be an issue for such a market.

    Id argue the huge sums of money made before piracy is factored in is somthing not talked about hardly. most games are going multi platform and the PC exclusives have there market and will aways make money regardless of piracy. MMOs bypass this all together making there money on accounts, so possible will see huge benifits in that genre by this new technology.

    May 6th, 2008 at 3:24 am Reply









GAME DEALS

, , , , , ,

RELATED STORIES
ON THE FRONT PAGE NOW
GAME DEALS
Sign up for our daily updates! Enter your e-mail and get fresh gaming news delivered straight to your mailbox once a day.
   




Stories by category: Action | Delay | Demos | Eye candy | Fighting | FPS | General news | Industry | Microsoft | MMO | Music | Nintendo | Online | PC | PlayStation 3 | Racing | Release dates | Review | RPG | RTS | Rumor | Screenshots | Sony | Sports | TPS | Videos | Wii | Xbox 360