Home Become an editor or a contributor!
Here’s how..
Front page/news/features Community Discussions Image Galleries Contact Mobile RSS feed
Where it stands: Nintendo’s online services
BY Se AjalaJune 22nd, 2008 More on:

Ask any gamer who has the most catching up to do in the online service department and the majority will point to the house that Mario built.  But is it really that bad?

Of course, when looking at any of the home console’s online services you have to do a compare and contrast to what is currently the best, which happens to be the 360’s Xbox LIVE service.  But I’ve decided to have a closer look at Nintendo’s system, and see what they were offering a lot more objectively than simply saying, “Oh, there’s no voice chat, in-game messaging, or achievement system.  It sucks!”  I chose to go through my experience with the games I’ve played online, downloaded, and the services offered and to give you my assessment on whether the Wii’s online offerings are complete a waste time, so-so, or capable.

The past can be a good measuring stick for the future

Online gaming first cracked the home console mainstream with the last generation of systems.  SEGA’s Dreamcast was the first of the systems to really play up this point, but while the vision was there sadly the market and support wasn’t.  The PS2 jumped out of the gate with the promise of online gaming and while there were some games that had begun to toy with the feature through the use of a ethernet adapter that also let you use dial-up, it was games like the Socom series, Madden, and Final Fantasy XI that helped bring the vision of online gaming front and center to it’s user base.  And who can forget the original Xbox?  With the introduction of Xbox LIVE, it can be said that the popularity of Halo 2 combined with the easy unified implementation of the system helped to further usher us into the groove of online gaming.

While all of this was happening, Nintendo’s GameCube was lacking behind the other systems.  Sure you there was a broadband adapter but the games that took advantage of the feature were few and far between.  Besides some Phantasy Star Online games, there was virtually nothing that the mainstream audience could get into. This was also hindered by the systems low user base, add all those factors up and things were really stacked against Nintendo in terms of the online market.

Moving forward

With the introduction of the 7th generation of gaming systems, the foray into online gaming was pretty much a foregone conclusion.  All systems had outlined plans for online gaming, and Microsoft struck first blood and drew a definitive line in the sand with the introduction of Xbox LIVE for the 360.  This would be the measuring stick that Nintendo and Sony would have to live up to and Sony did its best to start the out as close to the standard set by Microsoft as possible, as well promise their user-base expanding services (HOME).

Then there was Nintendo (which was the point of all this to begin with).  Nintendo’s online plan for the Wii first piqued my curiosity around the time the system was announced.  First off Nintendo promised us the system would be ready for online “right out of the box,” and they didn’t disappoint.  The Wii was the first out of all three system to include Wi-Fi for every system sold.  Period. No add-ons, or high end more expensive systems selling the feature.  And the thing that had me hook line and sinker was the promise that you’d be able to play all of Nintendo’s classic games from the NES to the N64 all on the Wii via downloads.  Then there was the promise of different channels, all adding further functionality to the system to round out the Big N’s first real attempt into having an online service.  It really seemed as if they were headed in the right direction.

Hot searches: prince of persia breasticles dead space Far Cry 2 tomb raider E for All gears of war littlebigplanet
Sign up for our daily updates! Enter your e-mail and get fresh gaming news delivered straight to your mailbox once a day.
RELATED STORIES
 
Viewing page: 1 2 3
Share your thoughts in the comments below and then join us at Community Discussions for more gaming talk!
POST AUTHOR
Se Ajala
More from this author
Se Ajala.
    Kataztrophy
    June 22nd, 2008
    at 8:43 pm

    If they got rid of the friends codes, it would be a lot better.

      Reply
    Danny Morgan
    June 22nd, 2008
    at 10:12 pm

    To be honest I don’t see the problem with friend codes. I don’t see the need for them either, but I’ve added a few friends and it doesn’t really do anything. There’s no point. As far as online is concerned I just add friends on there anyway or play randoms.

      Reply
    Razien
    June 22nd, 2008
    at 10:23 pm

    My only problem with Friend Codes is that they are not integrated. If I want to add a single person in 5 games, I have to write 6 different FC (one for the Wii, one for each game). Just don’t get it: Why not making the Wii to search wich of your friends have the game, and then add them automatically on your game’s friend list?
    Besides that, I’m really upset that Nintendo didn’t fix SSBB’s online, and the lack of effort from most third parties to put online functionality on Wii games. Except for EA and Activision, I can’t think of any 3rd party that provides a good online experience on the system…

      Reply
    DonWii
    June 22nd, 2008
    at 11:59 pm

    Nintendo said that demos are not mandatory for WiiWare game developers. Most people thought that to mean no demos would be available. That is why only Nintendo’s own game came with a demo, not a third party.

      Reply
    used cisco
    June 23rd, 2008
    at 5:10 am

    Yeah, FC wouldn’t be so bad if there was just one. But many? Nah, not good. You didn’t really mention that online gaming is completely free. That’s a huge bonus over LIVE. Paying for online gaming is unacceptable. I paid for the game when I bought it at retail. Multiplayer is a feature of the game. I should not be charged again unless it’s an MMO.

      Reply
    Se Ajala
    June 23rd, 2008
    at 8:04 am

    Cisco, what I tried to do with the article is just list some of the things that really jumped out at me personally in terms of where Ninty was and how they got to where they are now. There was a lot of ground to cover and I didn’t really want to rehash a lot of the same old same old stuff that we all know. I didn’t really want to get into the economics of it all because it could’ve easily turned to the bottom line of “Well it’s free, so in the end we should be happy we get anything…” I didn’t want to do that and felt just by dealing with the actual service that would keep it really objective in a sense.

    Now all that being said, you’re right online gaming being free is a definitely a deal breaker in most cases, in my case though it’s kind of an after thought. I got into online gaming w/ the PS2 (which was also free) and didn’t have to start paying for a service until I got Live. I agree with you about playing for standard multiplayer in a game you purchased.

      Reply

While we hate limiting conversations in any way, please note that insulting/abusive comments will be removed without hesitation.

What shall we call you around these parts?

Remains hidden from others at all times.
Front page/news/features Community Discussions Image Galleries
Get in touch Mobile Become a writer/contributor Subscribe to our RSS feed

450 subscribers