Home Become an editor or a contributor!
Here’s how..
Front page/news/features Community Discussions Image Galleries Contact Mobile RSS feed
Report claims Sony has bloody control pads
BY Ricardo BiltonJuly 14th, 2008 More on:

In one of the many examples of the fantasy worlds of video games affecting the actual world, a report written by John Lasker for Toward Freedom claims that Sony’s success with the PlayStation 2 is soaked with the blood of those killed in the violent clashes in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The report, released last Tuesday, claims that electronic companies like Sony obtained their roles in the war through their desire for what the Congolese call coltan. Coltan, short for Columbite-tantalite, is a mined material through which the elements niobium and tantalum can be extracted, with the latter of the two being essential to a wide variety of electronics. Used for its ability to withstand extreme heat, tantalum is a much-sought commodity among electronics manufacturers.

For these reasons, and perhaps a bit unfairly, the conflicts in the Democratic Republic of Congo have been dubbed “The PlayStation War” by some. Of course, ‘PlayStation’ could easily be replaced by any number of consumer electronics — laptop computers, cellular phones, prosthetic devices, hearing aids, etc — as tantalum is used much more widely than in just PlayStation products. Moreover, companies like Sony rarely mine for resources themselves. Instead, they to obtain materials through mining companies like Eagle Wings Resources International and Cabot Corporation.

Mining companies have long been the subject of much controversy, even outside the realm of tantalum. Eagle Wings Resources International and Cabot Corporation were two of three U.S. mining companies accused in 2004 of using the din of war to plunder Congo for its resources. Eagle Wings in particular was accused of using child labor to run its operations.

Sony spokesman Satoshi Fukuoka admits that Sony does indeed still use tantalum in its products, but says that because Sony rarely manufactures its products’ components directly, the company cannot say for certain from where the original materials derive

Regardless, the Toward Freedom report claims that it is impossible for Sony to claim that they are entirely innocent. Taken from the report: “David Barouski, a researcher and journalist from Wisconsin, says it is certain that the coltan from this conflict is also in SONY video game consoles across the world. “SONY’s PlayStation 2 launch (spring of 2000) was a big part of the huge increase in demand for coltan that began in early 1999,” said Barouski, who has witnessed the chaos of eastern DRC firsthand.”"

Some critics, on the other hand, seemed more keen on blaming consumers themselves. Oona King, a British politician implicated gamers in supporting the mining injustices. “Kids in Congo were being sent down mines to die so that kids in Europe and America could kill imaginary aliens in their living rooms,” she said.

King raises a good point. Should gamers feel guilty about buying products from companies that may or may have not had dealings with immoral mining companies? Are the consumers really the ones to blame?

The answers to these questions undoubtedly raise countless more. The fact, however, remains that Sony, for better or for worse, is hardly the sole player (or benefactor) in this situation. Instead, it is one of many actors in a web of economic pressures, lapes of ethics, and humanitarian disasters.

Let’s try keeping that in mind when we finally get a chance to play Resident Evil 5.

Hot searches: prince of persia breasticles dead space Far Cry 2 tomb raider E for All gears of war littlebigplanet
Sign up for our daily updates! Enter your e-mail and get fresh gaming news delivered straight to your mailbox once a day.
RELATED STORIES
 
Share your thoughts in the comments below and then join us at Community Discussions for more gaming talk!
POST AUTHOR
Ricardo Bilton
More from this author
Ricardo Bilton.
    Dan Haspert
    July 14th, 2008
    at 2:39 am

    First of all I will agree to the point that as a consumer we should be aware of what we buy and the effect said products have on the world and its inhabitants. When it was revealed that child laborers were producing Air Jordan’s-and after the outcry of consumers-Nike pulled contracts until the Chinese could assure them that child labor would not be used.

    But who is really to blame is the DRC government for not protecting its children, and the companies who exploit them. These are the real bad guys, these are the people who need to feel the pressure from the international community, but since the complaints fall on deaf ears lets blame consumers and their consumerism.

    Can Sony be more involved in knowing where their components come from? Yes, and they should. Can we as consumers, yes but its much harder to do that.

      Reply
    Luke Walker
    July 14th, 2008
    at 5:33 pm

    Dan you stole my Nike line of thought. I still don’t buy them.

    Consumers never really know about these things untill reports like this come out. It’s a terrible thing when countries like these and the people are taken advantage of in this way. Is this somehow on my head becuase I bought a product? Hell no! Is it Sony’s? I don’t believe so. Maybe they could have gotten an alternate material or a source of what they wanted elsewhere. It said in the report that they got it from multiple sources. If so then they have to think about cost and whether they had the ethics to resist getting it cheap because of the situation.

      Reply

While we hate limiting conversations in any way, please note that insulting/abusive comments will be removed without hesitation.

What shall we call you around these parts?

Remains hidden from others at all times.
Front page/news/features Community Discussions Image Galleries
Get in touch Mobile Become a writer/contributor Subscribe to our RSS feed

450 subscribers