Home Become an editor or a contributor!
Here’s how..
Front page/news/features Community Discussions Image Galleries Contact Mobile RSS feed
EA says second-hand sales are a critical situation
BY Matthew RazakAugust 28th, 2008 More on:

secondhand

We all buy used games, even the immensely wealthy…I think. But do you know what you’re doing whenever you buy one? You’re crushing the hopes and dreams of publishers around the world by cutting them out of the deal. See, once a game is sold, the developer doesn’t see anymore profit off of it. Retail stores get all the money from selling used games and that money serves them well. The effect this actually has on the developers themselves is debatable, but EA has come forward and claimed that it is a very serious situation.

“I’d actually make the point that for us second-hand sales is a very critical situation, because people are selling multiple times intellectual property,” said Jens Uwe Intat, senior VP and general manager for European publishing at EA in a recent interview, going on to explain that second-hand gaming sales can’t be compared to other industries because in those industries (cars, books, clothes) the products get worn down and new ones are needed eventually. However, this doesn’t happen with gaming and thus developers take a bigger hit from second-hand sales, theoretically.

Don’t worry about poor ol’ EA, they have plan: more digital distrubution and downloadable products. EA is looking into “business models that are more and more online-supported with additional services and additional content that you get online. So people will see the value in not just getting that physical disc to play at home alone, but actually playing those games online and paying for them.” If you feel bad for the retailers now (I don’t know why you would), don’t. They’ve got nothing to worry about.

Hot searches: prince of persia breasticles dead space far cry 2 Tomb raider E for All gears of war littlebigplanet
Sign up for our daily updates! Enter your e-mail and get fresh gaming news delivered straight to your mailbox once a day.
RELATED STORIES
 
Share your thoughts in the comments below and then join us at Community Discussions for more gaming talk!
POST AUTHOR
Matthew Razak
More from this author
Matthew Razak.
    bhive01
    August 28th, 2008
    at 3:18 pm

    I’ve bought second hand games and I did think of this while doing it. But, if you can’t find a new copy then I don’t feel nearly so bad.

      Reply
    Paul M. Watson
    August 28th, 2008
    at 5:51 pm

    Wow. That is as ignorant a viewpoint as the RIAA suing its customers. Get over it game producers, make your money on the first sale and then, like everyone else, let it go. When people buy something they should own it, not rent it for perpetuity.

      Reply
    MaxVest
    August 28th, 2008
    at 11:30 pm

    People don’t buy multiple cars at a time just because they like to have a variety to choose from, either (well I do, but I’m a currency forger). His logic is flawed.

    The goods themselves may be durable (debatable), but entertainment spending is discretionary. Every time a person buys a game for $60 and sells it back for $30, they have $30 more to spend on a new game. It cycles back in.

      Reply
    ZeroAX
    August 29th, 2008
    at 8:39 am

    facing boolsit. really wtf. maybe you should make people pay a subscription so they can play single player games huh EA? it’s a physical product once you sell it to me it belongs to me and I can sell it to whoever i like

      Reply

While we hate limiting conversations in any way, please note that insulting/abusive comments will be removed without hesitation.

What shall we call you around these parts?

Remains hidden from others at all times.
Front page/news/features Community Discussions Image Galleries
Get in touch Mobile Become a writer/contributor Subscribe to our RSS feed

443 subscribers