EA says second-hand sales are a critical situation |
|
| BY Matthew Razak Aug. 28th, 2008 | More on: |

We all buy used games, even the immensely wealthy…I think. But do you know what you’re doing whenever you buy one? You’re crushing the hopes and dreams of publishers around the world by cutting them out of the deal. See, once a game is sold, the developer doesn’t see anymore profit off of it. Retail stores get all the money from selling used games and that money serves them well. The effect this actually has on the developers themselves is debatable, but EA has come forward and claimed that it is a very serious situation.
“I’d actually make the point that for us second-hand sales is a very critical situation, because people are selling multiple times intellectual property,” said Jens Uwe Intat, senior VP and general manager for European publishing at EA in a recent interview, going on to explain that second-hand gaming sales can’t be compared to other industries because in those industries (cars, books, clothes) the products get worn down and new ones are needed eventually. However, this doesn’t happen with gaming and thus developers take a bigger hit from second-hand sales, theoretically.
Don’t worry about poor ol’ EA, they have plan: more digital distrubution and downloadable products. EA is looking into “business models that are more and more online-supported with additional services and additional content that you get online. So people will see the value in not just getting that physical disc to play at home alone, but actually playing those games online and paying for them.” If you feel bad for the retailers now (I don’t know why you would), don’t. They’ve got nothing to worry about.









August 28th, 2008
at 3:18 pm
I’ve bought second hand games and I did think of this while doing it. But, if you can’t find a new copy then I don’t feel nearly so bad.
August 28th, 2008
at 5:51 pm
Wow. That is as ignorant a viewpoint as the RIAA suing its customers. Get over it game producers, make your money on the first sale and then, like everyone else, let it go. When people buy something they should own it, not rent it for perpetuity.
August 28th, 2008
at 11:30 pm
People don’t buy multiple cars at a time just because they like to have a variety to choose from, either (well I do, but I’m a currency forger). His logic is flawed.
The goods themselves may be durable (debatable), but entertainment spending is discretionary. Every time a person buys a game for $60 and sells it back for $30, they have $30 more to spend on a new game. It cycles back in.
August 29th, 2008
at 8:39 am
facing boolsit. really wtf. maybe you should make people pay a subscription so they can play single player games huh EA? it’s a physical product once you sell it to me it belongs to me and I can sell it to whoever i like