Which loads games faster, PS3 Slim or phat? |
|
| BY Jason Townsend-Rogers Aug. 30th, 2009 | More on: |
Sony’s decision to trim down the size of the PlayStation 3,in both system scope and price, has succeeded in creating some serious momentum for themselves. However, as appealing as the system is aesthetically, the question remains…how does it functionality compare to its older, chunkier brother?
We may have the answer to that question, through a series of videos that compare the start-up and loading of PS3 titles in both the slim and regular versions of the system. Based on these videos, one could easily conclude that the original PS3 actually loads up games faster than its thinner counterpart, a conclusion that this site makes rather unabashedly.
It remains to be seen whether these conclusions are true; for now though, I will hang on to my original 60 GB backwards-compatible PS3 with a renewed sense of pride.









August 30th, 2009
at 11:51 am
Let me just add that that site is definately NSFW. Haha.
August 30th, 2009
at 1:33 pm
well from the vids you posted the slim beat the old when loading into a lvl and loading the batman game from start.
so….?
August 30th, 2009
at 2:54 pm
You have to wonder if Sankaku Complex even bothered to watch those videos. The Blu-ray load’s a little slower, but the game loads are faster, and in both cases it’s just a matter of seconds. Either they’re so desperate for news they have to create it themselves, or they’re flame baiting.
August 30th, 2009
at 6:22 pm
they had to make it less expensive somehow, the BluRay drive is where they made that cut.
remember the ps2 vs. the ps2 slim? your ps2 slim couldn’t read scratched games as well as the original ps2 could.
same reason, cheaper drives in order to cut cost.
September 24th, 2009
at 4:46 am
This is such a great article.I have gain lots of information here.I was not having this idea.Thanks for sharing this…