<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analyst: Modern Warfare 2 DLC was too cheap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 04:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nate Of The Greats</title>
		<link>http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/#comment-159989</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nate Of The Greats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/?p=72437#comment-159989</guid>
		<description>a $10 MP would have got my money, but i hate how these companys think they can get away with an extra 5 dollars for one JUST ONE more map, and two of those 3 were remakes, not even orginals... they just need to stop being money hogs and do something new, they might just get a good name for doing so. look at fallout 3 and its add-ons, all five of those add ons brought AT LEAST 10 hours of just the main quest, than with the extra land/side quests, new guns/outfits, characters and even the level cap, etc... it streched my money to the max. on the other hand this MP will get stale after use, the whole multiplayer of MW2 got boring to me before my first pres. sure its fun, but lets add a new gameplay type, or newer killstreaks, more weapon add-ons?? anything to make the dull multiplayer and map pack better and fresh. im going to stay away from these dull copies of FPS for now, and pick up something new, like RDR or even Brink, maybe fallout 4 will be good too, i just know i&#039;m not going to be paying for any &quot;NEW CONTENT&quot; thats 15, 20, or higher. this compay is setting the bar lower, and price higher...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a $10 MP would have got my money, but i hate how these companys think they can get away with an extra 5 dollars for one JUST ONE more map, and two of those 3 were remakes, not even orginals&#8230; they just need to stop being money hogs and do something new, they might just get a good name for doing so. look at fallout 3 and its add-ons, all five of those add ons brought AT LEAST 10 hours of just the main quest, than with the extra land/side quests, new guns/outfits, characters and even the level cap, etc&#8230; it streched my money to the max. on the other hand this MP will get stale after use, the whole multiplayer of MW2 got boring to me before my first pres. sure its fun, but lets add a new gameplay type, or newer killstreaks, more weapon add-ons?? anything to make the dull multiplayer and map pack better and fresh. im going to stay away from these dull copies of FPS for now, and pick up something new, like RDR or even Brink, maybe fallout 4 will be good too, i just know i&#8217;m not going to be paying for any &#8220;NEW CONTENT&#8221; thats 15, 20, or higher. this compay is setting the bar lower, and price higher&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mini mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/#comment-151291</link>
		<dc:creator>mini mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/?p=72437#comment-151291</guid>
		<description>na way i only brought it cause i knew about the 7 day xbox live extra otherwise it would have been a complete rip of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>na way i only brought it cause i knew about the 7 day xbox live extra otherwise it would have been a complete rip of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrod Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/#comment-151100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrod Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/?p=72437#comment-151100</guid>
		<description>Economics 101: the MARKET decides the price, and if people happily hand over $15 for five maps, then Activision would be stupid not to charge that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economics 101: the MARKET decides the price, and if people happily hand over $15 for five maps, then Activision would be stupid not to charge that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberGek</title>
		<link>http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/#comment-151060</link>
		<dc:creator>CyberGek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/?p=72437#comment-151060</guid>
		<description>The saddest thing is that my friends and I will continue to fork out the dough regardless of the price now. They know they&#039;ve got us. Charge me up the a$$ - I don&#039;t care anymore!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The saddest thing is that my friends and I will continue to fork out the dough regardless of the price now. They know they&#8217;ve got us. Charge me up the a$$ &#8211; I don&#8217;t care anymore!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldor</title>
		<link>http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/#comment-151053</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/?p=72437#comment-151053</guid>
		<description>$15 was too much. But, sadly, as long as people speak with their wallets, this will continue. $20 is ridiclous though--that&#039;s a third of the full game&#039;s price and you get only a fraction of the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$15 was too much. But, sadly, as long as people speak with their wallets, this will continue. $20 is ridiclous though&#8211;that&#8217;s a third of the full game&#8217;s price and you get only a fraction of the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt N</title>
		<link>http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2010/04/14/analyst-modern-warfare-2-dlc-was-too-cheap/#comment-151049</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/?p=72437#comment-151049</guid>
		<description>Just because you can squeeze more money from someone&#039;s hands doesn&#039;t mean that it is a good practice.  I wonder if a $10 price tag would have made even more sales.  Also, just because someone paid $15 this time doesn&#039;t mean they will do it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you can squeeze more money from someone&#8217;s hands doesn&#8217;t mean that it is a good practice.  I wonder if a $10 price tag would have made even more sales.  Also, just because someone paid $15 this time doesn&#8217;t mean they will do it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

